A guest blog entry by melissa
I cried tonight. Somewhere around page 243 of Ecopsychology, about 8 or 10 paragraphs into Joanna Macy's "Working Through Environmental despair," I cried. I cried because she said it was OK. For the first time I felt my frustration, my rage, my crippling pain was justified. Reading her words made me realize that this hole inside of me, this emptiness that sneaks up on me, the unsettling feeling that something is very very out of place, is not caused by the social and environmental distress and disfunction that I see everyday but by the suppression of my feelings about them. Macy States that "Many people, conditioned to take seriously only those feelings that pertain to our immediate welfare, find it strange to think that we can suffer on behalf of hte larger society-and on behalf of our planet-and that such suffering is real, valid, and healthy." I can't agree more.
Continue reading "Alotta Errata" »
It was lovely to read lots of solstice greetings on the ecopsychology list. Gmail sorts messages into threads and gives each contributor a different colour so it made a lttle rainbow from round the world It tells of more storms in British Columbia, drought and bush fires in Australia. Here a songthrush was singing in the station as the trees start to bud.
we celebrate the web of life on our fragile electronic web
here's a song for winter solstice
Continue reading "happy solstice" »
I have watched David Attenborough's recent series Planet Earth with mixed feelings of awe and sadness. It seems these are shared by the team who made it, there is an accompanying series Planet Earth - the future in which an assortment of scientists, environmentalists, filmmakers and even a token Bush apologist denier for balance speak (they do not debate) interspersed with clips, the team talk of returning to areas where they have filmed before and sometimes seeing huge and awful changes. A veteran save the whale activist is near tears as he talks about the resumption of whaling by Japan and cronies.
Continue reading "television" »
A recent book, "Up Side of Down", introduces an ecological term "panarchy" to describe situations where systems increase efficiency and complexity at the expense of "resilience." Consider the difference between a bicycle and a motorcycle. There are only 2 ways a bike can break down but there are many ways a motorcycle can break down including running out of gas. It is easier to fix a bicycle and the "operator" needs less training. Thomas Homer-Dixon (Tad) claims the same is true of social systems. Local farming may be less "efficient" but more resilient than industrialized agriculture. A few wild pigs shut down the organic lettuce distribution across North America a few weeks ago. A brief power surge shut down the east coast power grid which effect communications systems, traffic and refrigeration. When complex systems break down people resort to simpler ones (bicycles, candles).
Continue reading "Panarchy" »
Recent Comments